The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. I like fast lenses, and my Nikkor 105DC is my favourite. - in my subjects' skin. 45 minutes. Standards have risen in recent years. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Required fields are marked *. Please send your photos of the Andromeda galaxy. It could easily rival 'bokeh monsters lenses' at fraction of their price. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. Your Baader filter passes 420-680nm and, in theory, a good APO should be able to focus that part of the spectrum with no chromatic aberration. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. I can tell you its a great performer for astro use. The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. The image shown below covers 4.96 x 5.98 degrees in the constellation Cassiopeia. Will this ever get old? Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. Some noteworthy targets to try. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. I typically shoot with Canon lenses, but the potential for low light photography (whether thats astrophotography or the ability to film at dusk) caught my interest. the EOS-clip filters are compatible with all EF lenses but not with the EF-s. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. $399 00. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. Wonderful image quality, lots of detail, contrasty, subject separation, fast and accurate AF, bright viewfinder, solid construction, unobtrusive in use, No weather sealing, makes all my other lenses look poor (even the 'L' zooms that, when I first got them, imagined could hardly be improved on). (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. But you raise the exact point, that primes should be chosen with a 2x factor. The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? Are you really using 135 a lot? 135 mm. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. Another thing that makes people go "wow" over the 135mm F2 lens design is the bokeh, which can be so creamy that distant backgrounds almost render as gradients. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. Instead it means the style of rendering. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Off topic, Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. What's it got and what's it like to use? The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. Best Canon Lens for Astrophotography [Top 8 Reviewed] Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open Read on to find out which you should be using and why! The flawless image quality is only half the story though. Its actually kind of neat to watch! The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). http://www.idyll.com/laneysat That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. It improves slightly stopped down. In fact, it might be fun to try! The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Stellarium has a great viewport feature that allows you to preview different lens and sensor combinations on DSO's before you decide on the focal length you want. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. Several functions may not work. This image of NGC 7000 was done at F/4 at iso 800 with a Canon 20D mod. You would be hard pressed to find any other lens on a full frame camera that produces creamier bokeh. Several functions may not work. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. I read and bought it. (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. This lens provides all of these requirements. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. This way you get both lenses with only one! :). I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. Personally, I can't stand these circles, and I see them as VERY distracting.Lots of fads come and go, and this is just another one of these fads that some photographers are obsessed with. It is by far the fastest focusing, best bokeh, and lowest light lens you will ever find. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej It turns out that this. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. PRICE. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. Bye I do not see much difference in background blur or bokeh. But this lens changed my mind. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. Has a good weight to it. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. Great for portraits. Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. I have a Nikon d 500. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. Just like the above samples, most are just bad. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. 1. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! My Rokinon 135F2 on my crop body is fun to play with.. a budget lens with budget construction on a discontinued camera system.. but hey im just a ham and egger https://flic.kr/p/21nj82V, I had a Canon 135/2 for a while, but I decided I preferred the 100 L used not as a Macro but a normal lens (which my non-L USM 100 Macro was quite poor for). Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Equipment used was an astromodified Canon 700D, Samyang 135mm f2, SkyTech Triband filter, Star Adventurer 2i, ZWO mini finder with ASI120MM, guiding with PHD2 and polar alignment using sharpcap. I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. Cost. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. Selecting between it and the 200mm Takumar was not an easy choice but, in the end, I chose the Takumar because it seemed to have slightly better contrast. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. Of course headline central sharpness is great, that is what grabs headlines, always shot at f2: any 135mm lens is going to give similar results. Holiday Savings $50 . Fast. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. I also tested 200 f/2.8 tele and it is one of the most perfect lens in existence, as well as the 135. ", I'd no problem with that. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. I've tested some of the old Pentax 6x7 lenses with a friend. A Bargain, very competively priced From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. Lagoon and Trifid wide field IC1396 nebula in Cepheus - wide field image. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. Nikon 300/4 ED IF, Sigma 50/2.8 DG Macro (not a telephoto, but good). Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Im so new to all of this so thank you for your insightful and educational posts. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. As it is it is earns a 9. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. Does the bright star reflection bother you? I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens for Canon EF Digital SLR Cameras The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. We think it rises to the challenge. One of Canon's best lenses for a reasonable price. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. I disagree. So there - it is not a perfect object. My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. As soon as e.g. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. The lenses I listed are certainly not the ONLY exceptional lenses made over the years. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. Lots of wet blankets around here. This photo was captured with the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens using a UV/IR cut filter and a QHY168C dedicated astronomy camera. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. Crazy fast AF! Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. We revisit a classic DPReviewTV episode in which Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake shoot a few rolls of Fujifilm's Acros 100 II, and a few frames on the X-T3 in Acros film simulation, to find out. Helps me as a beginner a lot I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. How's that for an endorsement? To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. But I sold it and went back to using a 70-200 (alongside a 24-70). Already wide open this lens produce some high quality photos. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. The Rokinon 135mm F2.0 is considered to be a full-frame lens because it can accommodate a full-frame image sensor with its 18.8-degree angle of view. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. If you own an EOS Camera - It's a no Brainer, Buy one @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. Generally, prime lenses have a reputation for being slightly sharper, and I have found that to be true whether I am shooting a nebula or a Scarlet Tanager. They are by nature designed to compromise by magnification and distance, and are therefore not optically optimized at any single setting. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. @juksu - you're such a liar. i too use the 135mm nikkor[ with a MB speed booster on fuji x for outstanding separation], also a samyang 85 mm 1.4 nikon mt with speedbooster also gives excellent separation, yes, I think I have read that the old Nikkor 135mm f3.5 was even sharper than the f2.8. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. You get what you get.#4: Cat in Underbrush.That's pretty good.#5: Woman with Blanket.It's like a snapshot. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. Really like the large focusing ring. It is a heavy lens. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). Bokeh is buttery smooth, best you can get from a 135mm. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Astrophotography is one of the ultimate tests of lens quality, as long exposure photography of deep-sky objects in space can highlight issues that are hidden during daytime photography. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame.

Japanese Wedding Ceremony Script, Houses For Sale In Kettering Ohio, Who Is Rhonda Vincent Married To, Qvc Isaac Mizrahi Short Sleeve Tops, Alexis Slam'' Williams Obituary, Articles C